[FSPA] Experimental High Score League Results for 04/27/2022 (Meet #1)

Fri Apr 29 16:40:41 EDT 2022

I'm a little afraid to say this, but one concern I have with how this works
is that people who always play together might continue to play together and
other people may feel a bit left out. I guess if there's enough outgoing
people who will ask lots of others to play than this would not be a
problem, but it could be an issue? I don't know. You tell me.

Steve

On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 4:22 PM Joe P. Said via FSPA <fspa at fspazone.org>
wrote:

> Yeah cool. I like the math component too
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 4:13 PM Steve Jones <172pilot at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I misunderstood when I first read it and thought it was going to work
>> that way.. I guess there's pros and cons to both ways.
>> As a geek, I had to take our scores and recalculate them to see if it
>> would have made a difference in standings.  Turns out there is a slight
>> difference in order but it's mostly the same:
>> I'm not pushing for any change.. just doing the calculations.  I'm just
>> in it for the fun!
>> This way, one amazingly good or bad game could offset the total points
>> more.  Note - I didn't do the scaling for 4 games vs 6 - I counted all
>> games since all I was interested in was the potential change in the
>> ordering.
>>
>> [image: image.png]
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 3:45 PM Joe P. Said via FSPA <fspa at fspazone.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> For reference there was a system created by another Dave, called Arcade
>>> or something like that. Kevin Stone will remember as it was used in a
>>> Magfest tournament.
>>>
>>> It gave a % number of the top score as your score. So if someone got 1
>>> trillion on Godzilla and the second score was 1B they would only get 0.1
>>> points and the top score would get 100. Similarly if someone got 1T and the
>>> second guy got 999B the second place would get 99.9.
>>>
>>> Just food for thought. I like whatever you're doing.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 5:38 PM Dave Hubbarvia FSPA <fspa at fspazone.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok!  Now that week 1 is in the books, so to speak, I'll explain the
>>>> scoring system a bit more.
>>>>
>>>> We had 11 players come out for week 1.  So for each game, top score
>>>> gets 10 points, bottom score gets 1 point, and everyone else gets a
>>>> flatly-distributed amount of points depending on how many people played
>>>> that week.  In this case, that differential is (roughly, there's rounding
>>>> involved) 0.9 points.  So 2nd place gets 9.1, third place gets 8.2, etc.
>>>> This will change week to week depending on how many people play.
>>>>
>>>> For the weekly totals, it's all the individual scores, times 4, then
>>>> divided by the number of machines actually played.  In this case we got
>>>> through all 6 without malfunctions, so the weekly factor is 4/6.  If say,
>>>> Hot Tip blew up mid-session, we'd just drop it and use the other machines
>>>> with a factor of 4/5.  This allows us to just get rid of machines that
>>>> malfunction without having to worry about rounding up everyone again to
>>>> play a replacement.
>>>>
>>>> No, I don't know why the machine scores aren't sorted.
>>>>
>>>> Everyone come out for week 2!
>>>>
>>>>         --- Dave
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 5:31 PM Dave Hubbard via League Manager via
>>>> FSPA <fspa at fspazone.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Meet Results - Experimental High Score League Summer 2022
>>>>> Meet #1 - April 27, 2022 <http://dare.league.papa.org/meetResults/1/1>
>>>>> Overall StandingsShow Points By Meet
>>>>> <http://dare.league.papa.org/pointsByMeet/1/1>
>>>>>
>>>>> PlayerTotal PointsHigh Scores
>>>>> Dave Hubbard <http://dare.league.papa.org/stats/1/1-1#wlbp_1> 37.6 4
>>>>> Stephanie Traub <http://dare.league.papa.org/stats/1/1-1#wlbp_10> 32.2
>>>>> 1
>>>>> Eric Steinberg <http://dare.league.papa.org/stats/1/1-1#wlbp_8> 29.8
>>>>> Steve Jones <http://dare.league.papa.org/stats/1/1-1#wlbp_3> 23.2
>>>>> Rob Wintler-Cox <http://dare.league.papa.org/stats/1/1-1#wlbp_7> 23.2
>>>>> Barry Schwartz <http://dare.league.papa.org/stats/1/1-1#wlbp_6> 23.2
>>>>> Jose Chong <http://dare.league.papa.org/stats/1/1-1#wlbp_11> 20.8
>>>>> John Locke <http://dare.league.papa.org/stats/1/1-1#wlbp_5> 16
>>>>> Matt Newton <http://dare.league.papa.org/stats/1/1-1#wlbp_2> 14.8 1
>>>>> Jared Spier <http://dare.league.papa.org/stats/1/1-1#wlbp_9> 12.4
>>>>> Scott Brooke <http://dare.league.papa.org/stats/1/1-1#wlbp_4> 8.8
>>>>> Match Results
>>>>> Group 1
>>>>> players
>>>>> Stephanie Traub
>>>>> Jose Chong
>>>>> Eric Steinberg
>>>>> Jared Spier
>>>>> John Locke
>>>>> Barry Schwartz
>>>>> Rob Wintler-Cox
>>>>> Steve Jones
>>>>> Scott Brooke
>>>>> Dave Hubbard
>>>>> Matt Newton
>>>>> Godzilla
>>>>> game 1 scorespts
>>>>> 61,229,450 5.5
>>>>> 23,242,350 1
>>>>> 155,712,720 9.1
>>>>> 37,745,440 3.7
>>>>> 75,874,020 7.3
>>>>> 83,932,110 8.2
>>>>> 33,873,970 2.8
>>>>> 66,881,830 6.4
>>>>> 41,323,030 4.6
>>>>> [image: ‡]265,169,980 10
>>>>> 33,556,870 1.9
>>>>> AC/DC
>>>>> game 2 scorespts
>>>>> 25,263,270 9.1
>>>>> 11,810,480 5.5
>>>>> 18,434,080 8.2
>>>>> 8,824,710 2.8
>>>>> 9,301,050 3.7
>>>>> 16,292,010 6.4
>>>>> 17,365,230 7.3
>>>>> 10,410,640 4.6
>>>>> 6,320,810 1
>>>>> [image: ‡]40,773,710 10
>>>>> 8,491,720 1.9
>>>>> Dialed In
>>>>> game 3 scorespts
>>>>> 155,420 6.4
>>>>> 194,280 7.3
>>>>> 215,120 8.2
>>>>> 28,770 1
>>>>> 50,670 1.9
>>>>> 87,080 3.7
>>>>> 127,890 4.6
>>>>> 129,910 5.5
>>>>> 76,310 2.8
>>>>> 572,330 9.1
>>>>> [image: ‡]660,640 10
>>>>> AvengersIQ
>>>>> game 4 scorespts
>>>>> 80,299,190 8.2
>>>>> 48,997,920 7.3
>>>>> 16,155,040 5.5
>>>>> 11,587,920 2.8
>>>>> 16,761,100 6.4
>>>>> 13,668,290 4.6
>>>>> 85,939,520 9.1
>>>>> 9,342,360 1
>>>>> 10,382,260 1.9
>>>>> [image: ‡]246,590,260 10
>>>>> 13,077,310 3.7
>>>>> Hot Tip
>>>>> game 5 scorespts
>>>>> 517,700 9.1
>>>>> 380,850 6.4
>>>>> 352,760 5.5
>>>>> 211,420 2.8
>>>>> 209,800 1.9
>>>>> 396,390 7.3
>>>>> 322,620 4.6
>>>>> 464,550 8.2
>>>>> 200,180 1
>>>>> [image: ‡]524,090 10
>>>>> 219,340 3.7
>>>>> Memory Lane
>>>>> game 6 scorespts
>>>>> [image: ‡]359,950 10
>>>>> 73,830 3.7
>>>>> 166,330 8.2
>>>>> 102,300 5.5
>>>>> 73,650 2.8
>>>>> 82,140 4.6
>>>>> 103,560 6.4
>>>>> 167,520 9.1
>>>>> 62,940 1.9
>>>>> 120,560 7.3
>>>>> 47,030 1
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> FSPA mailing list
>>>>> FSPA at fspazone.org
>>>>> http://lists.fspazone.org/mailman/listinfo/fspa
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> FSPA mailing list
>>>> FSPA at fspazone.org
>>>> http://lists.fspazone.org/mailman/listinfo/fspa
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> FSPA mailing list
>>> FSPA at fspazone.org
>>> http://lists.fspazone.org/mailman/listinfo/fspa
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> FSPA mailing list
> FSPA at fspazone.org
> http://lists.fspazone.org/mailman/listinfo/fspa
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fspazone.org/pipermail/fspa/attachments/20220429/54718378/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 58893 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fspazone.org/pipermail/fspa/attachments/20220429/54718378/attachment.png>